ANALISIS EFEKTIVITAS FORKLIFT 5 TON DI PT XYZ DENGAN METODE OVERALL EQUIPMENT EFFECTIVENESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53893/austenit.v17i2.11056Keywords:
Forklift; Overall Equipment Effectiveness; Six Big Losses; Idle and Minor; Fishbone Diagram.Abstract
Forklifts play a vital role in ensuring the smooth production and distribution of materials in industrial environments. The effectiveness of forklift operation significantly influences productivity, particularly in the oil and gas sector, which demands high punctuality and efficiency. This study aims to analyze the operational effectiveness of a 5-ton forklift at PT XYZ by applying the Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) method, which consists of three main components: availability, performance, and quality. In addition, the six big losses approach is used to identify the primary sources of inefficiency. The results show that the highest OEE value was recorded in June at 91.04% (availability 94.24%, performance 96.60%, and quality 100%), while the lowest was in July at 82.20%, falling below the world-class OEE benchmark of 85%. Fishbone diagram analysis indicates that idle and minor losses are the largest contributors, accounting for 61.9% of the total losses. These are mainly caused by human factors, such as low work discipline, insufficient operator skills in executing standard procedures, irregular work methods, and the absence of a real-time system for recording and reporting minor disturbances. Other supporting factors include limited direct supervision, excessive workload, and non-optimal preventive maintenance schedules. To address these issues, the study recommends improvements such as regular operator training, clearer and more structured work procedures, implementation of daily log sheets to record idle time, improvement of forklift operation routes to minimize obstacles, and routine preventive maintenance scheduling for critical components, including brakes, batteries, forks, and electrical systems.
Downloads
References
Aditama, F. (2021). Perancangan dan analisis statik sistem mekanisme pengangkat pada forklift automatic guided vehicle (AGV) (Tugas akhir). Institut Teknologi Nasional. https://eprints.itenas.ac.id/1517
Amri, A., & Nurjaya, M. (2022). Delapan puluh–dua puluh: Membangun budaya organisasi dengan penerapan prinsip Pareto di KSPPS Bakti Huria Syariah. Emik, 5(2), 222–240. https://www.ejournals.umma.ac.id/index.php/emik/article/view/1601
Annisa, M., & Setiawan, N. (2017). Pengukuran kinerja hot strip mill dengan metode overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) (Studi kasus pada industri baja di Cilegon, Banten). Jurnal Teknoin, 23(2), 153–160. https://journal.uii.ac.id/jurnal-teknoin/article/view/8927
Borris, S. (2006). Total productive maintenance: Proven strategies and techniques to keep equipment running at peak efficiency. McGraw-Hill.
Davis, R. K. (1995). Productivity improvement through TPM. Prentice Hall.
Deradjad Pranowo, I. (2019). Sistem dan manajemen pemeliharaan. Yogyakarta.
I Made Ivan, W. C. S., Darsin, M., & Edoward, M. R. (2019). Aplikasi overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) dalam upaya mengatasi tingginya downtime pada stasiun ketel di PG X Jawa Timur. Multitek Indonesia: Jurnal Ilmiah, 13(2), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.24269/mtkind.v13i2.1614
Lestari, V. I., & Suryadi, J. A. (2021). Analisis efektivitas mesin pada stasiun ketel dengan menggunakan metode overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) di PT XYZ. Tekmapro: Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 16(2), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.33005/tekmapro.v16i2.240
Liu, W., Ye, W., Sun, J., Dong, Z., & Wang, Q. (2014). KPIVs analytical method based on improved weighted dynamic Pareto chart. An Indian Journal, 10(7), 1917–1926. https://doi.org/10.24269/MTKIND.V13I2.1614
Nadondu, B., Chanpahol, A., Srisawad, S., & Thiakthum, S. (2024). Improving forklift efficiency by ECRS techniques: A case study in a logistics company. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. https://doi.org/10.5109/7172286
Nakajima, S. (1988). Introduction to total productive maintenance. Japan Institute of Plant Maintenance.
Oktaria, S. (2011). Perhitungan dan analisis overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) pada proses awal pengolahan kelapa sawit (PT X) (Skripsi). Universitas Indonesia. https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20295993
Pinto, H., Pimentel, C., & Cunha, M. (2016). Implications of total productive maintenance in psychological sense of ownership. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 1076–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.232
Prayoga, D., Prayitnoadi, R. P., & Saparin. (2020). Sistem preventive maintenance control pada mesin bubut BJ-1640GD (Studi kasus di laboratorium teknik mesin Fakultas Teknik Universitas Bangka Belitung). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penerapan Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (SNPPM), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.33019/snppm.v4i0.2156
Putra, R. A. (2019). Analisis kinerja mesin pompa soda ash dengan perhitungan OEE dan usulan TPM di IPA PDAM Tirtanadi Sunggal (Skripsi). Universitas Medan Area. https://repositori.uma.ac.id/handle/123456789/11217
Sidinra, A., Wijaya, A. E., & Sumarjono, E. (2021). Optimasi fleet management system (FMS) guna mengurangi waktu tidak produktif (idle time) pada alat angkut. Mining Insight, 2(2), 123–132. https://journal.itny.ac.id/index.php/mining/article/view/3566
Sriwana, I. K., & Putro, A. K. (2018). Pengukuran kinerja lini fannet dengan menggunakan metode overall equipment effectiveness di PT Tripacific Electrindo. Jurnal Inovisi. https://ejurnal.esaunggul.ac.id/index.php/inovisi/article/viewFile/3586/2831
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors and Publisher

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, Authors retain copyright and grant the AUSTENIT right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
AUSTENIT, the Editors and the Advisory International Editorial Board make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in AUSTENIT are the sole responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.











