Perbandingan Kondisi Jalan Menggunakan Metode IRI dengan SDI (Studi Kasus: Jalan Nasional di Kota Palembang) (45-50)

Abstract

Pemerintah melakukan pemeliharaan penanganan jalan nasional melalui instansi Kementerian PU PR. Pemeliharaan penanganan jalan memerlukan data kondisi jalan nasional, untuk itu Kementerian PU PR menggunakan 2 metode survey kondisi jalan, yaitu berdasarkan IRI dan SDI. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menyajikan perbandingan 2 metode tersebut. Hasil yang dicapai adalah data kondisi jalan berdasarkan IRI dan SDI.Terjadi perbedaan nilai kondisi jalan berdasarkan IRI dan SDI. Pada tahun 2015 kondisi jalan berdasarkan IRI, baik 99,7 km, sedang 37,29 km, rusak ringan 23,6 km dan rusak berat 0.5 km, sedangkan kondisi jalan berdasarkan SDI, baik 121.21 km, sedang 23,5 km, rusak ringan 15,58 km dan rusak berat 0.8 km. Pada tahun 2016 kondisi jalan berdasarkan IRI, baik 46,18 km, sedang 98,74 km, rusak ringan 14,34 km dan rusak berat 1,83 km, sedangkan kondisi jalan berdasarkan SDI, baik 77,71 km, sedang 56,6 km, rusak ringan 25,22 km dan rusak berat 1,5 km. Perbedaan ini disebabkan karena metode menggunakan IRI menggunakan sensor membaca kerataan jalan, sedangkan metode SDI menggunakan survey manual yang menyajikan kerusakan struktual. The government maintains national roads through the Ministry of Public Works and Public Housing. Road maintenance  requires national road condition data, in order to do that Ministry of PUPR uses 2 survey methods of road conditions, based on IRI and SDI. This study aimed to present a comparison between two methods. The results showed road condition data based on IRI and SDI.There was a difference in the value of road conditions based on IRI and SDI. In 2015, the road conditions based on the IRI were good 99.7 km, moderate 37.29 km, 23.6 km lightly damaged and 0.5 km heavily damaged, while the road conditions based on SDI were 121.21 km, 23.5 moderate km, it was slightly damaged 15.58 km and heavily damaged 0.8 km. In 2016, the road conditions based on IRI were either 46.18 km, moderate 98.74 km, 14.34 km lightly damaged and 1.83 km heavily damaged, while the road conditions based on SDI were 77.71 km, 56.6 km, lightly damaged 25.22 km and heavily damaged 1.5 km. This difference was due to RI method used a sensor to read road flatness, while the SDI method used a manual survey which presented structural damage.