AUDIT JUDGMENT: PENGALAMAN AUDITOR, SKEPTISISME AUDITOR DAN LOCUS OF CONTROL

Authors

  • Desri Yanto Jurusan Akuntansi, Politeknik Negeri Sriwjaya
  • Eka Jumarni Fithri Jurusan Akuntansi, Politeknik Negeri Sriwjaya
  • Kurnia Widya Oktarini Jurusan Akuntansi, Politeknik Negeri Sriwjaya
  • Fadiyah Lefi Anggraini Jurusan Akuntansi, Politeknik Negeri Sriwjaya
  • M. Faishal Akbar Athaillah Jurusan Akuntansi, Politeknik Negeri Sriwjaya
  • Adelia Rizky Utami Jurusan Akuntansi, Politeknik Negeri Sriwjaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36257/jrta.v10i1.11704

Abstract

This study aims to empirically examine and analyze the effect of Auditor Experience, Auditor Skepticism, and Locus of Control on Audit Judgment quality. This study employs a quantitative approach. Data were collected through the distribution of questionnaires to auditor respondents working at the Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia (BPK RI) Representative of South Sumatra. The data analysis technique employed was the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) approach based on Partial Least Square (PLS) using SmartPLS 3.0 software. Based on the hypothesis testing results, it was found that Auditor Skepticism and Locus of Control have a positive and significant effect on Audit Judgment. This indicates that the higher the level of professional skepticism and the stronger the internal locus of control of an auditor, the better the resulting audit judgment. Conversely, the results showed that Auditor Experience does not have a significant effect on Audit Judgment, indicating that the length of work tenure does not necessarily guarantee accuracy in audit decision-making.

Keywords: : Audit Judgment, Skepticism, LOC, SmartPLS.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-19

How to Cite

Yanto, D., Fithri, E. J., Oktarini, K. W., Anggraini, F. L., Athaillah, M. F. A., & Utami, A. R. (2026). AUDIT JUDGMENT: PENGALAMAN AUDITOR, SKEPTISISME AUDITOR DAN LOCUS OF CONTROL. Jurnal Riset Terapan Akuntansi, 10(1), 276-289. https://doi.org/10.36257/jrta.v10i1.11704